by Marty Coleman | May 10, 2013 | Branding - 2013 |
It’s part 3 of the Branding series.

Brand Awareness
A big effort of every company is to get into the consumers’ mind an idea of their brand. If they show off their facilities, it is usually so that the facility helps to crystalize their brand identity with the consumer. A happy dairy farmer and her family for example, in front of a verdant pasture. Perhaps it’s a gleaming new factory in Wisconsin, putting out reams of clean and effective paper products.
But companies don’t just show off any old factory just to show it. Most companies know there are things the consumer isn’t interested in seeing, and sometimes, even if they are interested, the company doesn’t think it is in their best interest to show it. I understand that.
But sometimes it’s important for us to see what a company isn’t all that hot on showing us.
No to Guilt
First up, I feel sad, but I don’t feel guilty about what happened in Bangladesh, and either should you. I am NOT saying we should not be aware of what we buy, how it is manufactured, distributed, and sold. I think we should. But that is not the same as taking personal blame for a tragedy around the globe that was due to illegal construction, terrible government oversight and fatal management business practices.
There are many who would like you and me to feel guilty. The reason they want us to feel guilty is that they think that is how change will happen, i.e., guilt people into feeling bad and a change of behavior will follow. Does that work long term with anyone? It works with 6 year olds in church, but not with 26 year olds. It works with a naive and insecure newlywed, but not with that same man or woman 15 years later. I don’t think it works, and even if it did, it’s dishonest in it’s method and manipulative in it’s intent. I don’t like it.
Yes to Awareness
But there is something that does work. It’s called education. Instead of ranting and railing against American capitalism and consumerism and trying to lay all the blame for all the world’s ills on those backs, why not do your best, without condemnation and guilt for the consumer, to explain what is happening through the supply chain. Just let us see it. Let us learn about it. With minimal manipulation, help us see the connection between the PR branding the company shows us and the rest of the company, good and bad. Let the evidence be the guide to making better consumer choices, not guilt.
Explain the good and bad of globalization. Explain how it does bring jobs to places that don’t have them but it also brings greed and corruption and short cuts in the name of profit. Explain that low prices aren’t bad but it’s also good to have an ethical and moral platform below which we do not believe anyone should fall whether it be a garment worker in Bangladesh, an innocent bystander washing clothes in a polluted river downstream from a factory, an hourly wage earner in the US. or the fate of the CEO. They all deserve a standard of treatment that we should aspire to.
If we don’t have direct control over it, what can we do to help move those that do have the control towards that better ethical and moral stance?
What are your solutions?
_________________
Drawing and commentary by Marty Coleman, who is very sad so many died.
Quote adapted from a quote by Walter Landor, 1913-1995, German born, American designer and brand developer, Owner of Landor Associates.
________________
Like this:
Like Loading...
by Marty Coleman | May 9, 2013 | Branding - 2013 |
It was a bit serendipitous to start a series on branding and then have the current Abercrombie and Fitch debacle land in my lap for Brand Day #2.
Here is a take on it from the A & F CEO’s point of view, a former A & F employee point of view, and finally an A & F customer point of view. Chime in and tell me what you think.

Let’s start with a quote. This is from a recent Salon.com article about the CEO of Abercrombie and Fitch. Note the words in bold, which were spoken by the CEO.
When I ask him how important sex and sexual attraction are in what he calls the “emotional experience” he creates for his customers, he says, “It’s almost everything. That’s why we hire good-looking people in our stores. Because good-looking people attract other good-looking people, and we want to market to cool, good-looking people. We don’t market to anyone other than that.”
Now let’s hear how that plays out in reality from a former 5 year A & F employee, N, who doesn’t want to be public since she still knows people who work at A & F. I talked to her this morning about what it was like to work there as a manager.
First, here is a part that is probably pretty common in retail and I don’t really have too much of a problem with it.
Our employees were only supposed to work 1-2 shifts per week (5-10 hours). They had to purchase a specific outfit before they were allowed to be on the schedule. A few times a year the company releases a ‘key look’ we all have to wear. It might be 2-3 outfits we could choose from, but once the key look changed, everyone has to buy it (at half off) and wear only that to work. The ‘look policy’ is incredibly strict as well. We weren’t allowed to wear makeup, no nail polish, no crazy hair color or cut, and you had to look completely natural. Everyone had to be ‘styled’ perfectly as well, so the tuck of the shirt is done in a particular way, the roll of your jean cuff, how many buttons on your shirt are buttoned/unbuttoned.
If a brand wants a certain look, that’s not necessarily a bad thing, right? It certainly is a common phenomenon in retail. I wouldn’t want to work there, but that doesn’t mean other wouldn’t.
But she goes on to describe more problematic issues with the branding.
I (sadly) managed an A & F stores for 5 years right after I graduated college. One of the main reasons you experienced poor customer service is because the pressure on the manager to staff the store with good looking ‘models’ (that is what the sales associate position is called) is completely overwhelming. That is what my job performance was based on. It did not matter if my store was beating sales goals every single day, I had the best customer experience, and the store was folded down to perfection, if a higher up walked in and I had one ‘ugly’ kid on my sales floor, there was gonna be hell to pay. At least one day a week we were required to go to college campuses and other places where we could ‘recruit’ good looking kids to come work in our stores.
It was incredibly frustrating. There are not many good looking, ‘popular’, and aspirational teenagers who want to work 5 hours a week for minimum wage. The kind of employees I had to search for are the kind of kids who don’t need a job. The managers are held to unrealistic expectations when it comes to hiring. We had weekly manager meetings to sit down and talk about where to go out in the city and find good looking workers. If I went one week and did not find a ‘recruit’ I was in trouble.
That barely scratches the surface of what goes on in those stores. We also had to send pictures of our new hires to higher ups to ensure they were up to standard. If we found out someone from corporate office was coming to visit the store I would have to scrap the schedule for that day and call in all of my best looking kids to have them work instead of whoever else was originally scheduled. Miserable work experience.
The kids that work there are in two groups. either models or your stockroom employees. The models are the ones you see on the sales floor folding, helping customers, running the cash register. Turnover for the employees is incredibly high and managers are so busy with everything going on those associates rarely get much of training, which I think contributes to poor customer experience. Instead of chatting, texting, doing whatever those employees should be helping customers and folding. I always felt bad for the kids I hired for the stockroom. They knew what was up and why they were back there.
Now, let’s here how that branding effort translates into an actual customer experience. Kelly M was in the same conversation I had this morning, only she was talking as a customer.
On rare occasions I’d stop in to A & F, just to look around and to have a sense of what I was already judging, and each time I determined that the styling of their clothing remained unchanged for 15 years. During the 2000s and the height of a conservative and sexist/hostile time, I was taken aback by some of their t-shirts, such as a men’s tee that read, “you look like I need another drink” and something like “you were hotter freshman year” and women’s tees that generally presented a message of being slutty, drunk or both.
One particular time I had gone in with a friend to look around for giggles. I found something somewhat intriguing to try on, but alas, there was nobody around to assist me. I spotted a guy toward the front of the store looking like he had nothing going on in his head. I had to walk up to him and tap him on the shoulder. Admittedly, I proceeded to objectify him, “uhh, hey sweet cheeks I need to try this on.” Ditzy and unapologetic, he was like “ohh okay!” as he let me into a fitting room. He kinda lingered a little bit, as though he was waiting for me to invite him in with me to make out with him. weirrrddd.
And then? Then my friend and I were completely ignored for the remainder of our time there. Nobody had acknowledged us upon our entrance, and it was the same for our exit. I think WE were the ones saying, ‘Have a good night!’ Needless to say, I’ve had no desire to visit Abercrombie ever again. Our chemistries just don’t match up.
So, what does it all mean? It means that whether they knew it or not, they had communicated their true corporate self and it was a corporate self that was and currently is shooting itself in the foot by being short sighted and letting ego take precedence over smart business practices.
Perhaps you have heard it said about individuals, ‘Outer beauty without inner beauty is no beauty at all’. The same is true of A & F and any other company.
Who you are, and what a company is, can not be hidden for long. It cannot NOT be communicated, one way or another.
The original article where the conversation started is by Monica Bielanko over at Babble.com
__________________
Drawing by Marty Coleman, whose dad used to shop at A & F in NYC back in the 60s & 70s for special Christmas presents.
Quote by – Paul Watzlawick , Psychologist & Philosopher
Like this:
Like Loading...
by Marty Coleman | May 8, 2013 | Branding - 2013 |
As you know, I have been off at a conference this past week. It was SoFabCon, a bloggers conference focusing on the relationship between brands, bloggers and consumers. It got me thinking about the concept of brands and I thought I would explore the idea in my drawings this week.

Loyalty is Magic
What makes you loyal to a brand? It’s a good question to contemplate because that loyalty is magic. It means you have voluntarily committed yourself to a company or product. You have committed to giving them your money again and again and again in exchange for something you highly value.
The Valuable Why
So the next question is, What made you value that product? This is also a good question because in the answer you will find out about yourself. Perhaps you value that product because it works really well, like an certain cleanser or car? Is the value of how the product is in how it makes you feel, like a spa or a restaurant? Or maybe the value in how it makes you appear to others, like a certain pair of shoes or a house in a certain neighborhood? Those are just 3 ways of valuation, I am sure there are many others so let me know how and why value something. By the way, do not infer any judgment on my part about those 3 various ways of valuation. They are all legitimate at times, and they are all illegitimate at other times.
Examples
The quote above succinctly explains why some brands are so far above other brands, and stay that way for generations. Here are 3 examples:
Bell Telephone – Can you think of anything more impossible than the idea that you can talk to someone with your real voice over a wire to someone hundreds and hundreds of miles away? It was impossible, unfathomable and absurd to contemplate for the average American. Then it became possible in 1876 and people rewarded the creator of that magic with their brand loyalty for many decades.
Ford Motor Company – They made owning an automobile, something that was impossible for the average American, possible. The creation of the Model T in 1908 allowed generations of families to do the impossible, simple as that.
Apple Computer – Here is an impossible idea; Let’s take the essence of a giant, room sized computer that costs hundreds of thousands of dollars, and reduce it so it’s small enough that a person can have one in their home AND they can afford it. On top of that, let’s make it really cool and easy to operate. This idea was rejected by much smarter people than Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak because it was impossible.
And now, 35 years later, that company has the most loyal consumers of any brand on the face of the earth. Why? Because they gave us something impossible, and have continued to do so ever since. FULL DISCLOSURE: I am not being paid or compensated by Apple, but I have been one of those consumers, now on my 3rd Apple computer (each of the first 2 having lasted 7 years with no problems and the current one having lasted 5 years with only one, quickly resolved issue). In addition our family has had 3 other Apple computers, 4 iPhones, an iPad and numerous ipods over the years.
Brand Magic
What brands have given you magic and why? What have they done for you that was so impossible that you have rewarded them with your loyalty?
_________________
Drawing and commentary by Marty Coleman, who is loyal to Oreos.
Quote by Nick Gadsby, Lawes Consulting
_________________
Like this:
Like Loading...